PRISM: The Journal of Emerging Threats | Complex Statecraft is the Irregular Warfare Center’s (IWC) flagship journal of national and international security affairs. PRISM’s mission is to provide unique insight for current and future national security leaders on emerging challenges beyond strictly the military domain, and the integrated statecraft required to address them. These emerging challenges include, but are not limited to, transnational and/or multi-domain threats; gray zone, hybrid, or irregular conflict; emerging technologies (e.g., AI and cyber); and geoeconomic competition.
PRISM is committed to excellence, scholarly rigor, and practitioner- and policy-relevant “big ideas” in the national and international security realms. We are an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal that aims to be a ready reference on the desks of practitioners, academics, and policymakers, and to be cited as foundational research and analysis in national and international security documents.
PRISM is published semiannually (spring and fall) and welcomes unsolicited submissions from policymakers, practitioners, and scholars, particularly those that present fresh thought, enduring insight, or best practices related to the current and emerging national and international security environment. We seek to publish provocative, insightful, and well-reasoned submissions. We welcome contributions not only from established authorities in the field but also emerging voices, including early career practitioners, policymakers, and scholars.
PRISM accepts three types of submissions:
Research Articles
Standard book reviews
• Reviews should be 700–900 words in length.
• The PRISM book reviews section covers the latest scholarship across national security, international security, and related fields, from the theoretical to the policy-focused, and from the regional to the global.
• A book review should inform the reader of the book’s content, quality, and place in the overall context of its field, and make any necessary policy or scholarly recommendations.
Extended book reviews
• These reviews should be 2,000–4,000 words in length, including footnotes, endnotes, and tables and/or figures.
• While similar to standard book reviews in several ways, extended book reviews go further as they typically entail a review of two or more related books and/or a more in-depth analysis of a single book than a standard book review.
Submissions should follow these guidelines. Note: These guidelines are intended to help set expectations and ensure a smooth submission and review process for both prospective authors and the editorial team but are not meant to be overly prescriptive.
The publication threshold for submissions is largely determined by topical relevance, scholarly standards of argumentation, quality of writing, and readability. Authors are strongly encouraged to provide clear solutions or actionable knowledge for the reader.
Our process from the initial receipt of submissions to the review and publication can last several months. However, we aim to inform authors of our decision to accept or reject their submission within 30 days.
The first stage for a newly submitted paper is the editorial staff’s decision on whether to send it for peer review.
Peer reviewers are chosen for the following reasons:
Moreover, if a submission is accepted but we are unable to publish it for some reason, PRISM will revert publication rights to the author so that they may explore other publication options.